Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K1100M and AMD Radeon HD 8790M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, video clip outputs và ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - oto Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - oto Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Bạn đang đọc: Amd radeon hd 8790m vs
NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
vs
AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Xem thêm: 7 Cách Trị Hôi Nách Hiệu Quả Nhất, 7 Cách Trị Hôi Nách Tự Nhiên Đơn Giản Và Hiệu Quả
Differences
Reasons to lớn consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) laterAround 5% higher texture fill rate: 22.59 GTexel / s vs 21.6 GTexel / sReasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8790M
Around 20% higher chip core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 706 MHzAround 27% better floating-point performance: 691.2 gflops vs 542.2 gflopsAround 43% higher memory clock speed: 4000 MHz vs 2800 MHzAround 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1306 vs 10913x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 751 vs 2533.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7005 vs 2236Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.759 vs 8.6492.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 465.631 vs 174.5552.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.576 vs 0.6422.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - clip Composition (Frames/s): 28.839 vs 11.7324.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 80.418 vs 16.3Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - oto Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2181 vs 18923.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2656 vs 861Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2014 vs 1443Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - oto Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2181 vs 18923.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2656 vs 861Around 40% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2014 vs 1443| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 706 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops vs 542.2 gflops |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz vs 2800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1306 vs 1091 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 751 vs 253 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 7005 vs 2236 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.759 vs 8.649 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 465.631 vs 174.555 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.576 vs 0.642 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - đoạn clip Composition (Frames/s) | 28.839 vs 11.732 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 80.418 vs 16.3 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2181 vs 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2656 vs 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2014 vs 1443 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - oto Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2181 vs 1892 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2656 vs 861 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2014 vs 1443 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8790M
